结论 - Neo 16 A25 是配备 9955HX3D 的最快游戏笔记本电脑
新款 XMG Neo 16 A25 今年还首次配备了 AMD 处理器，包括配备 3D V-Cache 的新款 Ryzen 9 9955HX3D。与旧款 Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 一样，额外的缓存使某些游戏的性能明显提高。正如我们在 我们对 9955HX3D 的分析表明与标准版 Ryzen 9 9955HX 相比，优势并不是特别明显，尤其是在 QHD 分辨率下，215 欧元的附加费只在有限范围内物有所值。不过，如果您想使用最快的游戏机，那就来对地方了。
在设备方面，AMD 和英特尔型号的 Neo 16 有以下区别 英特尔型号的 Neo 16.AMD 机型目前只提供 96 GB 内存，而且不支持 Thunderbolt 和 USB 4.0。此外，英特尔机型现在可以订购 Wi-Fi 7 模块。英特尔机型在电池续航时间方面也有明显优势。
在显示屏方面，新的迷你 LED 面板值得推荐，175 欧元的附加费也绝对合理。不过，Neo 16 的所有型号仍然存在图形切换问题，因为目前不支持高级 Optimus。XMG 在其官方主页上通知客户目前正在与 Nvidia 联系以解决该问题。不过，目前还不能保证该功能一定能实现。
Pros
+ 极高性能（CPU 和 GPU）
+ PCIe 5.0 和多种接口
+ 超亮迷你 LED 面板
+ 极佳的画质和 300 Hz 频率
+ 坚固的高质量外壳
+ 舒适的键盘
+ 良好的维护选项和高达 96 GB 的内存
+ 快速读卡器
+ 可选水冷
Cons
- (仍然）没有内置显示屏的高级优化和 G-Sync 功能
- AMD 机型没有 USB 4.0/Wi-Fi 7
- 游戏时风扇噪音大
- 电源适配器电缆短
- P3 出厂配置文件不是特别准确
采用 AMD CPU 的 Neo 16 与我们最近测试过的 Neo 16 E25（英特尔）有许多相似之处。有关机箱、功能、新的迷你 LED 面板和可选的 Oasis 水冷系统的全面信息，请参阅 我们对 Neo 16 E25 的评测.
规格
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 (XMG Neo 16 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 16 x - 5.4 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 145 W PL1 / Sustained, Fire Range-HX (Zen 5)
Graphics adapter
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 2604 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 576.52, Optimus, MUX-Switch
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 96 GB
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, NE160QDM-NM9, Mini-LED, glossy: no, HDR, 300 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G, 1024 GB
, 873 GB free
Weight
2.855 kg, Power Supply: 835 g
Price
4480 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
性能 - Ryzen 9 9955HX3D，最高 96 GB 内存
| 能源概况 | CPU TDP | CB 2024 Multi | GPU TGP | Time Spy Graphics | CP 2077 QHD Ultra | max.风扇容量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平衡型 | 45 瓦 | 1,296 分 | 150 瓦 | 22,210 分 | 103.4 fps | 45.9 dB(A) |
| 发烧级 | 85 瓦 | 1,826 分 | 150 瓦 | 22,239 分 | 103.6 fps | 49.8 dB(A) |
| 超增压 | 160/145 瓦 | 2,120 分 | 175 瓦 | 24,121 分 | 111.2 fps | 55.5 dB(A) |
| 电池（发烧友） | 42/35 瓦 | 979 分 | 40 瓦 | 5,476 分 | 25.4 fps | 33.8 dB(A) |
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D: Ø5974 (5932.08-6044.12)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5347 (4011.63-6161.43)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø6151 (6038.65-6270.58)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5832 (5537.87-5930.32)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5145 (5108.56-5171.97)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5596 (5505.09-5679.4)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H -2! | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (2072 - 2160, n=3) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Average of class Gaming (331 - 2298, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (129.4 - 130, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138.2, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (38864 - 39266, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (2165 - 2179, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (15146 - 15177, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (847 - 851, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (6041 - 6044, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (321 - 333, n=2) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=139, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (80 - 80, n=2) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (145803 - 148086, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (7151 - 7300, n=2) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (19788 - 20551, n=4) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (3146 - 3237, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (23468 - 23669, n=2) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (2381 - 2401, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (42.3 - 42.7, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (44.9 - 46.6, n=2) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (0.3552 - 0.3677, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (80619 - 84943, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (230738 - 238426, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (9656 - 9750, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (171718 - 173351, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (32989 - 33636, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (122088 - 126658, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (161913 - 163423, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (2497 - 2517, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (42676 - 45384, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62274, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (38765 - 43032, n=2) | |
Performance Rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 -1! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9639 - 9647, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (11728 - 11735, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (10829 - 11003, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (18879 - 19123, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2199 - 2264, n=2) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1958 - 2021, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2651 - 2700, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1776 - 1874, n=2) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Average of class Gaming (235 - 480, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=132, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9647 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (56383 - 61533, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 103347, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (59750 - 65369, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (59506 - 72898, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (96.1 - 103.6, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=141, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
* ... smaller is better
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
9502 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
6580 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
324 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
403 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
63.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
118.6 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
294 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
862 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø14274 (12676.44-14430.92)
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 53735 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 49845 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 21652 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 6029 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9 - 18, n=12) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 37, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (123 - 259, n=12) | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 164, n=111, last 2 years) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 453, n=131, last 2 years) | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24 | Assassin's Creed Shadows | Alan Wake 2 | Call of Duty Black Ops 6 | Indiana Jones and the Great Circle
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 115.6, n=15) | |
| Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 115.6, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (37 - 59, n=11) | |
| Average of class Gaming (30 - 59, n=24, last 2 years) | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (92 - 136, n=6) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average of class Gaming (60 - 127, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (66.1 - 115.9, n=13) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (32.4 - 115.9, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø152.6 (146-156)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 186.9 | 183.9 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 313 | 288 | 275 | 248 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 235 | 233 | 208 | 173.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 181.1 | 152.6 | 133.6 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 453.1 | 342.9 | |||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 333.4 | 260.7 | 227.4 | 218.8 | 156.9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 226 | 208 | 180 | 164 | 111.2 |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 145.4 | 138.6 | 127.7 | 88.5 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 421 | 399 | 357 | 154.2 | 101.2 |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 229 | 209 | 165 | 161 | 127 |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 203 | 151.9 | 133.4 | 106 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 126 | 115 | 97 | 69 | 59 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 317 | 308 | 291 | 59.8 | 36.8 |
排放与能源
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.6 / 25.6 / 25.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 47.2 / 55.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.1 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX3D, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G | Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB | Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -2% | -3% | -6% | 5% | |
| off / environment * | 24.1 | 24 -0% | 24 -0% | 23.8 1% | 22.8 5% | 23 5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.6 | 25 2% | 26 -2% | 29 -13% | 29 -13% | 23 10% |
| Idle Average * | 25.6 | 27 -5% | 26 -2% | 29 -13% | 29 -13% | 23 10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.6 | 29 -13% | 26 -2% | 29 -13% | 29 -13% | 23 10% |
| Load Average * | 47.2 | 52 -10% | 52.4 -11% | 40.5 14% | 47.7 -1% | 40.46 14% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 55.5 | 55 1% | 55.4 -0% | 53.6 3% | 54.8 1% | 59.75 -8% |
| Load Maximum * | 55.5 | 55 1% | 55.4 -0% | 53.6 3% | 61.1 -10% | 59.75 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | 1% | -8% | 5% | -10% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46.3 | 49 -6% | 47.8 -3% | 44.2 5% | 42.8 8% | 39 16% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44.3 | 45 -2% | 46.7 -5% | 48.1 -9% | 50.2 -13% | 51 -15% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 30 -0% | 28.4 5% | 33 -10% | 27.6 8% | 36 -20% |
| Idle Bottom * | 31.1 | 30 4% | 28.9 7% | 36.1 -16% | 26.2 16% | 38 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.36 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.42 / 1.9 Watt |
| Idle | 13.2 / 16.8 / 17.1 Watt |
| Load |
164.2 / 392.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX3D, Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G | Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB | Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | 2% | -38% | -19% | -29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 13.2 | 13.1 1% | 11.8 11% | 22.5 -70% | 9.9 25% | 25 -89% |
| Idle Average * | 16.8 | 17.5 -4% | 15.1 10% | 32.2 -92% | 28.6 -70% | 29.4 -75% |
| Idle Maximum * | 17.1 | 23 -35% | 15.8 8% | 34.3 -101% | 47.1 -175% | 31 -81% |
| Load Average * | 164.2 | 88 46% | 165.3 -1% | 169.3 -3% | 141.8 14% | 109 34% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 284 | 299 -5% | 296 -4% | 294 -4% | 253 11% | 290 -2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 282 | 297 -5% | 289 -2% | 288 -2% | 230 18% | 292 -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 392.8 | 428 -9% | 415.5 -6% | 371.5 5% | 233 41% | 325 17% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø315 (238-375)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø14.2 (10.7-19)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø284 (278-289)
Power consumption with external monitor
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø228 (209-235)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø221 (202-226)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø43.7 (37.3-77.9)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø210 (204-225)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø224 (215-231)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.3 (7.13-18.8)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø282 (275-294)
电池寿命
Notebookcheck 总体评分
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090
- 05/30/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品比较
Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
